Polity notes · Chapter 3 of 19
Union & its Territory
2 sections, 9 flashcards. Open a card to check your answer, or revise them in the app with spaced revision.
Union and its Territories
- Article 1: India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States
- Union of States = Only States
- Territory of India = States + UTs + any future acquisitions
- Article 2: Parliament can add new states
- Article 3: Parliament can change boundary/name of existing states
- Article 4: Laws made under Art. 2&3 (to amend Schedules 1&4) are not constitutional amendments under article 368
- Why “Union of States”?
- ‘Union of States’ instead of ‘Federation of States’ because:
- India is not result of an agreement among the states (e.g. USA)
- States have no right to secede from the federation
- India is divided into states only for administrative convenience
- Article 2 is for adding new territory e.g. Goa, Sikkim, Puducherry, D&D, D&N Haveli
- Article 3 is for existing territory e.g. Telangana, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh
- Bill under article 3
- 1. President must refer the Bill to State legislature (no need if UT)
- 2. Irrespective of response, President recommends Bill to be introduced in Parliament
- Bill under article 3 needs
- 1. Simple majority in both LS & RS ✔
- ✗ 2. Special majority in both LS & RS
- ✗ 3. Special majority in both LS & RS and ratification by half of the States
- To settle border dispute
- 1. Executive action is sufficient
- 2. Constitutional amendment not needed
- To cede Indian territory
- 1. Executive action is insufficient
- 2. Amendment u/a 368 is necessary
- Destructible States
- 1. India is described as ‘an indestructible union of destructible states’ (Ambedkar)
- 2. USA is described as ‘an indestructible union of indestructible states’
- Reason: Indian Parliament can redraw the political map of India without state’s consent.
- Remember: Territorial integrity or continued existence of any state is not guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
- ‘Territory of India’ is a wider expression than ‘Union of India’
- 1. Union of India includes only states
- 2. Territory of India includes states, Union Territories and future acquisitions
Check yourself
Union and its Territories
- Article 1: India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States
- – Union of States = Only States
- – Territory of India = States + UTs + any future acquisitions
- Article 2: Parliament can add new states
- Article 3: Parliament can change boundary/name of existing states
- Article 4: Laws made under Art. 2&3 (to amend Schedules 1&4) are not constitutional amendments under article 368
Why “Union of States”?
- ‘Union of States’ instead of ‘Federation of States’ because:
- – India is not result of an agreement among the states (e.g. USA)
- – States have no right to secede from the federation
- India is divided into states only for administrative convenience
- Article 2 is for adding new territory e.g. Goa, Sikkim, Puducherry, D&D, D&N Haveli
- Article 3 is for existing territory e.g. Telangana, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh
Bill under article 3
- 1. President must refer the Bill to State legislature (no need if UT)
- 2. Irrespective of response, President recommends Bill to be introduced in Parliament
Bill under article 3 needs
- 1. Simple majority in both LS & RS ✔
- ✗ 2. Special majority in both LS & RS
- ✗ 3. Special majority in both LS & RS and ratification by half of the States
To settle border dispute
- 1. Executive action is sufficient
- 2. Constitutional amendment not needed
To cede Indian territory
- 1. Executive action is insufficient
- 2. Amendment u/a 368 is necessary
Destructible States
- 1. India is described as ‘an indestructible union of destructible states’ (Ambedkar)
- 2. USA is described as ‘an indestructible union of indestructible states’
- Reason: Indian Parliament can redraw the political map of India without state’s consent.
- Remember: Territorial integrity or continued existence of any state is not guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
- ‘Territory of India’ is a wider expression than ‘Union of India’
- 1. Union of India includes only states
- 2. Territory of India includes states, Union Territories and future acquisitions
State Reorganisation
| 1953 | Andhra |
| 1960 | Gujarat, Maharashtra |
| 1963 | Nagaland |
| 1966 | Haryana |
| 1971 | Himachal |
| 1972 | Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura |
| 1975 | Sikkim |
| 1987 | Arunachal, Goa, Mizo |
| 2000 | Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttrakhand |
| 2014 | Telangana |
| 1948 | Dhar Commission by Govt; JVP committee by Congress (Linguistic Provinces Commission) | X Administrative convenience ✔ |
| 1953 | First linguistic state Andhra created States Reorganisation (Fazal Ali) Commission | Report in 1955 Accepted linguistic basis |
| 1956 | States Reorganisation Act 1956 7th Constitution Amendment Act 1956 | 14 states and 6 UTs created |
| 1960 | Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 | Bombay divided into Maharashtra and Gujarat |
| 1966 | Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 Shah Commission | Punjab divided to create Haryana and Chandigarh |
- Committees to reorganize states: A timeline
Check yourself
State Reorganisation
- 1953 — Andhra
- 1960 — Gujarat, Maharashtra
- 1963 — Nagaland
- 1966 — Haryana
- 1971 — Himachal
- 1972 — Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura
- 1975 — Sikkim
- 1987 — Arunachal, Goa, Mizo
- 2000 — Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttrakhand
- 2014 — Telangana
- 1948 — Dhar Commission by Govt;
JVP committee by Congress (Linguistic Provinces Commission) — XLinguistic basis;
Administrative convenience ✔ - 1953 — First linguistic state Andhra created States Reorganisation (Fazal Ali) Commission — Report in 1955 Accepted linguistic basis
- 1956 — States Reorganisation Act 1956 7th Constitution Amendment Act 1956 — 14 states and 6 UTs created
- 1960 — Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 — Bombay divided into Maharashtra and Gujarat
- 1966 — Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 Shah Commission — Punjab divided to create Haryana and Chandigarh
Which of the following is correct chronological order of formation as full States of Indian Union? PYQ 2007
- Sikkim-Arunachal Haryana
- Nagaland-Haryana-Sikkim-Arunachal Pradesh
- Sikkim-Haryana-Nagaland-Arunachal Pradesh
- Nagaland-Arunachal Haryana
Answer: Nagaland-Haryana-Sikkim-Arunachal Pradesh
Nagaland 1963 → Haryana 1966 → Sikkim 1975 → Arunachal Pradesh 1987.
All 19 chapters of Polity notes
- Making of the Constitution1 sections
- Preamble3 sections
- Union & its Territory2 sections
- Citizenship2 sections
- Fundamental Rights8 sections
- Fundamental Duties3 sections
- Directive Principles8 sections
- Amendment & Basic Structure4 sections
- Parliamentary System1 sections
- Federal System3 sections
- Judiciary5 sections
- Parliament & the President2 sections
- Houses, Council of Ministers & PM5 sections
- Parliamentary Business6 sections
- Committees & State Legislature4 sections
- Centre–State Relations1 sections
- Inter-State Relations1 sections
- Emergency Provisions1 sections
- Constitutional & Statutory Bodies2 sections